4.7 Article

GeomBD3: Brownian Dynamics Simulation Software for Biological and Engineered Systems

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING
卷 62, 期 10, 页码 2257-2263

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.1c01387

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [MCB-1932984]
  2. U.S. National Institutes of Health [GM-109045]
  3. NSF national supercomputer centers [TG-CHE130009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GeomBD3 is a robust Brownian dynamics simulation package that can easily handle natural or engineered systems in diverse environments and arrangements, providing a versatile tool for researchers from various disciplines for rational design and explanatory role of systems.
GeomBD3 is a robust Brownian dynamics simulation package designed to easily handle natural or engineered systems in diverse environments and arrangements. The software package described herein allows users to design, execute, and analyze BD simulations. The simulations use all-atom, rigid molecular models that diffuse according to overdamped Langevin dynamics and interact through electrostatic, Lennard-Jones, and ligand desolvation potentials. The program automatically calculates molecular association rates, surface residence times, and association statistics for any number of user-defined association criteria. Users can also extract molecular association pathways, diffusion coefficients, intermolecular interaction energies, intermolecular contact probability maps, and more using the provided supplementary analysis scripts. We detail the use of the package from start to finish and apply it to a protein-ligand system and a large nucleic acid biosensor. GeomBD3 provides a versatile tool for researchers from various disciplines that can aid in rational design of engineered systems or play an explanatory role as a complement to experiments. GeomBD version 3 is available on our website at http://chemcha-gpu0.ucr.edu/geombd3/ and KBbox at https://kbbox.h-its.org/toolbox/methods/molecular-simulation/geombd/.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据