4.2 Article

Partitioning of Crocin in a Novel Aqueous Two-Phase System Composed of a Deep Eutectic Solvent and Acetonitrile

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING DATA
卷 67, 期 5, 页码 1205-1213

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jced.2c00027

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the partitioning of crocin in aqueous two-phase systems and found that the choline chloride-urea/ACN system exhibited higher partition coefficients and extraction efficiency under optimal conditions.
Saffron stigmas are considered as one of the mainsources for crocin extraction. Crocins have many therapeuticproperties and applications in different industries such as food andcosmetic in which their extraction and purification will be usefulcommercially and clinically. This work presents a study on thepartitioning of crocin in aqueous two-phase systems (ATPSs)composed of water, deep eutectic solvents (DESs), and acetonitrile(ACN). Two DESs based on choline chloride as the hydrogenbond acceptor (HBA) and urea and ethylene glycol as hydrogenbond donors (HBDs) were synthesized and considered as phase-forming components. Also, the effects of the hydrogen bonding,HBD species, weight percentages of DES, weight percentages ofACN, and temperature were investigated to evaluate the phase-forming ability of the ATPSs and the partitioning of crocin in these systems. It turned out that the choline chloride-urea/ACNsystem provides higher partition coefficients and a higher extraction efficiency of crocin under optimum conditions (40 wt % of DES,50 wt % of ACN, and 25 degrees C). Moreover, the conformation of crocin in the choline chloride-urea/ACN system was explored using aUV-visible spectrophotometer (UV-vis) and Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR), and no change was observed duringthe process. In the end, the UNIFAC model was applied to estimate the equilibrium data of both systems, in which the experimentaldata of two studied ATPSs were well described

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据