4.6 Article

Expression of DNA mismatch repair proteins in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04002-4

关键词

Cutaneous melanoma; Immune checkpoint inhibitors; Ipilimumab; Pembrolizumab; Nivolumab; DNA mismatch repair proteins; Mismatch repair deficiency; Microsatellite instability

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study investigated the protein expression of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Immunohistochemistry was performed on tumor tissue of 50 patients, and reduced MMR protein expression was observed in 16% of patients. Baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and reduced intratumoral MMR protein expression were significantly associated with favorable treatment response. However, further validation is required in larger patient cohorts.
Purpose To investigate the protein expression of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins in patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM) under immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. Methods Immunohistochemistry was performed on tumor tissue for MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 in 50 metastatic CM patients treated with ICI (ipilimumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab). Results Best overall response (BOR) rate was 48% (24/50). Reduced MMR protein expression (nuclear expression in < 80% of tumor cells) was observed in 8 patients (16%). Compared to other clinical parameters, baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and reduced intratumoral MMR protein expression (P = 0.0033) were determined as the only parameters significantly associated with favorable BOR. However, in this small study population, reduced MMR protein expression did not reach statistical significance in multivariate analysis. Conclusion Reduced MMR protein expression is observed in CM and might predict favorable BOR in patients treated with ICI, as was observed for other entities. However, these findings need to be substantiated in larger patient cohorts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据