4.5 Article

Age and sex differences in the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of upper limb muscles in middle-aged and older adults: A pilot study

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS
卷 134, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111002

关键词

Aging; Sex; Biomechanical properties; Viscoelasticity; Arm and forearm

资金

  1. Chang Gung Memorial Hospital [CMRPD1H0401-0402, BMRPD25]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the impact of age and sex on the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of arm muscles in middle-aged and older adults. The findings revealed that age and sex have significant influences on the muscle properties of the upper limbs.
Whether muscle properties gradually change with age and how muscle properties are affected by sex remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the influence of age and sex on the biomechanical and viscoelastic properties of arm muscles in middle-aged and older adults. In this cross-sectional study, 80 healthy participants were divided by sex (male and female), and each sex group, by 10-year age ranges (40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 years). Muscle properties, including tone, stiffness, elasticity, and mechanical stress relaxation time, were measured with the MyotonPRO. Our results showed that the muscle tone and elasticity of the deltoid and flexor carpi radialis, and the muscle tone of the flexor carpi ulnaris, were significantly greater in men than in women, whereas the stress relaxation time of the triceps was significantly greater in women than in men. Significantly greater muscle stiffness in the biceps brachii was found in the participants over 50 years old. Less muscle elasticity was found in the deltoid, triceps, and flexor carpi ulnaris in those over 70 years old. In conclusion, age and sex have considerable impacts on upper-limb muscle properties in middle-aged and older adults, which should be taken into consideration when planning health promotion projects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据