4.4 Article

Derivation of human triploid trophoblast stem cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS
卷 39, 期 5, 页码 1183-1193

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02436-w

关键词

Human trophoblast stem cell; Triploid; Partial hydatidiform mole; Placenta; Pregnancy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study established triploid human trophoblast stem cell lines derived from tripronuclear embryos, providing a useful in vitro model for studying human placental biology and disease.
Purpose Human trophoblast stem cells (hTSCs) are counterparts of the precursor cells of the placenta and are valuable cell models for the study of placental development and the pathogenesis of placental diseases. The aim of this work was to establish a triploid human TSC (hTSC(3PN)) derived from the tripronuclear embryos, which are clinically discarded but readily available, for potential applications in basic placental research and disease modeling. Methods Eighteen tripronuclear human zygotes from IVF were collected and cultured for 5-6 days. Five high-quality blastocysts were harvested and were individually cultured in hTSC medium. Finally, two hTSC lines were established after 10 days and could be passaged stably. Results The karyotyping analysis showed that hTSC(3PN) contained three sets of chromosomes. And the hTSC(3PN) exhibited typical features of hTSCs, with the ability to differentiate into two trophoblast lineages: extravillous cytotrophoblasts (EVTs) and syncytiotrophoblasts (STs). In addition, the hTSC(3PN) can mimic some vital features of trophoblast, including hormone secretion and invasion. Further studies showed that the proliferation and differentiation of hTSC(3PN) were reduced compared with normal hTSCs, which may be related to the disturbed metabolic signaling in hTSC(3PN). Conclusions We established the triploid hTSC lines derived from tripronuclear embryos, which provides a potentially useful research model in vitro to study human placental biology and diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据