4.1 Article

Impact of High-Pressure Processing and Sous Vide Cooking on the Physicochemical, Sensorial, and Textural Properties of Fresh Whiteleg Shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus)

期刊

JOURNAL OF AQUATIC FOOD PRODUCT TECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 6, 页码 508-524

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10498850.2022.2077157

关键词

High-pressure processing; sous vide processing; white shrimps; texture; sensory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Consumers increasingly prefer convenient, fresh, and healthy seafood products with natural flavor, color, taste, and extended shelf life. High-pressure processing (HPP) and sous-vide cooking (SVC) are two methods used in the food industry to extend the shelf life and enhance the natural flavor of shrimps. This study found that the combination of HPP and SVC processing affects the sensory and texture of fresh whiteleg shrimp and has the potential to produce minimally processed value-added shrimp products that are acceptable to consumers.
Consumers have a growing preference for convenient, fresh, and healthy seafood products with natural flavor, color, taste, and extended shelf life. High-pressure processing (HPP) and sous-vide cooking (SVC) are two methods that are applied in the food industry to extend the shelf life and enhance the natural flavor of shrimps. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the combination of HPP (300 MPa/350 MPa/400 MPa) and SVC (65 degrees C/15 min) on the physicochemical, sensorial, and textural (hardness) properties of fresh white shrimp (Litopenaeus setiferus). A decrease in hardness of samples treated with HPP was observed. Sensory and textural evaluation by consumers (n = 28) showed that the shrimp samples treated at 300 and 350 MPa were preferred. The results suggest that the combination of HPP and SVC processing affects the sensory and texture of fresh whiteleg shrimp (p <= .05). These findings indicate that combining HPP and SVC has the potential to produce minimally processed value-added shrimp products that are acceptable to consumers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据