4.6 Article

An insight on the effect of the hard segment domain on the thermo-mechanical and surface properties of new piperazine-based polyurethanes

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 139, 期 26, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.52467

关键词

biopolymers and renewable polymers; mechanical properties; polyurethane; surfaces and interfaces; thermal properties

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, 1,4-piperazinediethanol was used as a chain extender to synthesize a series of new polyurethanes. Renewable cross-linkers were also introduced to investigate the microphase separation, thermal, mechanical, and surface properties of the polyurethanes. The results demonstrate that the composition and structure of the polyurethanes significantly impact their properties and the introduction of cross-linkers can enhance the thermal stability and water contact angle of the polyurethanes.
1,4-piperazinediethanol was used as chain extender in the synthesis of new polyurethanes based on poly (tetramethylene oxide) glycol and 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate. Also new polyurethanes which contain renewable cross-linkers (polyethylene glycol sorbitan monolaurate (Tween (R) 20) and sorbitan monolaurate (Span (R) 20)) were obtained. The degree of microphase separation and the weight fraction of hydrogen-bonded urethane groups is calculated by FTIR spectroscopy. The thermal, mechanical, and surface properties are examined and related with the structure of the corresponding polyurethanes. Linear polyurethanes have good thermal stability with the 5% weight loss in the range 250-280 degrees C and cross-linked samples in the range 295-320 degrees C. Tensile strength and elongation at break have higher values (38 MPa and 1140%) when the 1,4-piperazinediethanol content is lower. The increase in the piperazine content leads to more hydrophilic polyurethane surface. Cross-linkers increase the water contact angle and thus the surface of the corresponding polyurethanes becomes hydrophobic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据