4.1 Article

Length-weight relationships of six fish species from the lower reaches of the Jinsha River, southwest China

期刊

JOURNAL OF APPLIED ICHTHYOLOGY
卷 38, 期 3, 页码 379-381

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1111/jai.14322

关键词

China; fish; Jinsha River; length-weight relationship

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51779105, 51979123]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Jianghan University [2019021]
  3. Innovative Research Team Foundation of the Department of Education of Hubei Province, China [T2020034]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study estimated the total length-weight relationships for six fish species from the lower reaches of the Jinsha River in southwest China and recorded new maximum length or weight values. All regression equations were highly significant, indicating a close relationship between total length and weight.
The total length-weight relationships (LWRs) were estimated for six fish species from the lower reaches of the Jinsha River, southwest China. Specimens were seasonally collected using gillnets and drift gillnets (mesh size 2 similar to 14 cm), benthic fyke nets (mesh size 1 cm), baited hooks (stationary longline) and electricfishing (36 V/12 A, depth 3 m), in six sites from 2016 to 2019. The fish length (TL = total length, standard length (SL) as well as weight (W) were determined to the nearest 0.1 cm and 0.01 g, respectively. The LWRs for Jinshaia abbreviata (Gunther, 1892) and Liobagrus marginatoides (Wu, 1930) are newly reported to FishBase. New maximum length or weight values were recorded for Pseudolaubuca engraulis (Nichols, 1925), Pseudobagrus truncatus (Regan, 1913), L. marginatoides, Abbottina obtusirostris (Wu & Wang, 1931) and Pseudobagrus pratti (Gunther, 1892). All regressions were highly significant, with the coefficients of determination r(2) > 0.950, and b values in the LWRs equations ranged from 2.399 to 3.484. For comparison and conversion, the SL-TL relationships were also estimated, with r(2) values ranging from 0.980 to 0.999.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据