4.5 Review

Gut Microbiota as a Hidden Player in the Pathogenesis of Alzheimer's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
卷 86, 期 4, 页码 1501-1526

出版社

IOS PRESS
DOI: 10.3233/JAD-215235

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; gut-brain axis; gut microbiota; systemic inflammation

资金

  1. Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  2. Korea Dementia Research Center (KDRC) - Ministry of Health Welfare
  3. Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [HU20C0187]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF2020R1A6A3A1306860612]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease, the most common neurodegenerative disorder, is not only characterized by pathological features in the brain, but also associated with changes in the gut microbiota, indicating a potential involvement of the gut-brain axis in its pathogenesis.
Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common neurodegenerative disorder, is accompanied by cognitive impairment and shows representative pathological features, including senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in the brain. Recent evidence suggests that several systemic changes outside the brain are associated with AD and may contribute to its pathogenesis. Among the factors that induce systemic changes in AD, the gut microbiota is increasingly drawing attention. Modulation of gut microbiome, along with continuous attempts to remove pathogenic proteins directly from the brain, is a viable strategy to cure AD. Seeking a holistic understanding of the pathways throughout the body that can affect the pathogenesis, rather than regarding AD solely as a brain disease, may be key to successful therapy. In this review, we focus on the role of the gut microbiota in causing systemic manifestations of AD. The review integrates recently emerging concepts and provides potential mechanisms about the involvement of the gut-brain axis in AD, ranging from gut permeability and inflammation to bacterial translocation and cross-seeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据