4.7 Article

Role of laser remelting and heat treatment in mechanical and tribological properties of selective laser melted Ti6Al4V alloy

期刊

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
卷 897, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163207

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Selective laser melting; Laser remelting; High cycle fatigue; Sliding wear; Ti6Al4V

资金

  1. ASTRA TUT Institutional Development Programme for 2016-2022 Graduateschool of Functional Materials and Technologies [2014-2020.4.01.16-0 032]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to enhance the surface quality and mechanical properties of a Ti6Al4V alloy manufactured using selective laser melting (SLM) by applying laser remelting. The research found that increasing the number of remelting steps can improve fatigue strength, strength, and wear resistance of the parts significantly.
The reliability and quality of additively manufactured parts are questionable. The present study aimed to improve the surface quality and mechanical and tribological properties of a Ti6Al4V alloy manufactured using selective laser melting (SLM). The effects of the laser remelting on its surface topology, mechanical properties, and sliding wear in a ball-on-plate configuration with a ball either above or below the plate were investigated systematically. The influence of the laser remelting approach on the anisotropy of the me-chanical and tribological properties was compared with that of the heat treatment approach. The surface quality and high cycle fatigue strength improved with an increase in the number of melting steps. The compressive and impact strengths also increased with an increase in the number of melting steps. The wear resistance in both configurations was higher in the remelted samples than in the samples after SLM. The results confirmed that laser remelting, as an affordable approach, could significantly improve the reliability of parts fabricated by the SLM process. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据