4.7 Article

Emotion-related impulsivity predicts increased anxiety and depression during the COVID-19 pandemic

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 289-299

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.037

关键词

Emotion-related impulsivity; Urgency; Anxiety; Depression; Suicidal ideation; Stress reactivity; Covid-19 pandemic

资金

  1. NIMH [R01MH 110477]
  2. University of California

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Emotion-related impulsivity is related to internalizing symptoms and predicts higher levels of depression, anxiety, general distress, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic. The impact of emotion-related impulsivity on stress levels varies, with one form predicting internalizing symptoms at low stress levels and another form predicting internalizing symptoms at high stress levels.
Introduction: Emotion-related impulsivity, defined by poor constraint in the face of emotion, is related to internalizing symptoms, cross-sectionally and longitudinally. Internalizing symptoms, though, are profoundly tied to stress reactivity, and little is known about how emotion-related impulsivity relates to stress reactivity. Method: Taking advantage of a sample that had completed measures of depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and two forms of emotion-related impulsivity before the pandemic, we asked participants to complete three weekly follow-up internalizing assessments early in the pandemic. Results: Among the 150 participants, pre-pandemic emotion-related impulsivity scores predicted higher depression, anxiety, general distress, and suicidal ideation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Controlling for prepandemic scores, one form of emotion-related impulsivity (Feelings Trigger Action) predicted increased anxiety and general distress. We also examined how pre-pandemic emotion-related impulsivity was moderated by weekly COVID-related stress. One form of emotion-related impulsivity (Pervasive Influence of Feelings) predicted internalizing symptoms at low stress levels, and a different form (Feelings Trigger Action) predicted internalizing symptoms at higher stress levels. Limitations: Limitations include the small sample size, the absence of repeat measures of impulsivity, the attrition of individuals with more internalizing symptoms, and the reliance on self-rated measures. Conclusions: Forms of emotion-related impulsivity predict increases in anxiety and distress over time, but the interactions with stress levels appear to vary. Emotion-related impulsivity can be addressed with accessible intervention tools, suggesting the promise of broader screening for those at risk for internalizing symptoms during periods of high stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据