4.7 Review

Safety of transcranial magnetic stimulation in unipolar depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials

期刊

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
卷 301, 期 -, 页码 400-425

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.047

关键词

Safety; Tolerability; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Major depressive disorder; Systematic review; Meta -analysis

资金

  1. Taipei Veterans General Hospital [V108D44-003-MY3-1]
  2. Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital [TYAFGH E 111056]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology [108-2321-B-075-004-MY2]
  4. Brain Research Center, National Yang-Ming University from The Featured Areas Research Center Program within Ministry of Education (MOE) in Taiwan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the safety and patients' tolerance of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in patients with major depressive disorder. The results showed that TMS intervention was not associated with an increased risk of drop-out due to adverse events or serious adverse events. However, there was a significant increase in non-serious adverse events such as headaches, discomfort, and pain. Despite these adverse events, TMS treatment was generally well-tolerated.
Background: To study the safety and patients' tolerance of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), we conducted a systematic review and meta- analysis of the major depressive disorder population. Methods: Our study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guide-lines. We searched the literature published before April 30th, 2021 and performed a random-effects meta-ana -lyses which included drop-out due to adverse events, serious adverse events and other non-serious adverse events as primary and secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 53 randomized sham-controlled trials with 3,273 participants were included. There was no increased risk of drop-out due to an adverse event (active TMS intervention group=3.3%, sham TMS intervention group=2.3%, odds ratio = 1.30, 95% CI= 0.78-2.16, P = 0.31) or a serious adverse event (active TMS inter-vention group=0.9%, sham TMS intervention group=1.5%, odds ratio = 0.67, 95% CI= 0.29-1.55, P = 0.35). Our findings suggest that TMS intervention may significantly increase the risk of non-serious adverse events including: headaches (active TMS intervention group=22.6%, sham TMS intervention group=16.2%, odds ratio = 1.48, 95% CI= 1.15-1.91, P = 0.002), discomfort (active TMS intervention group=10.9%, sham TMS inter-vention group=5.0%, odds ratio 1.98, 95% CI= 1.22-3.21, P = 0.006) and pain (active TMS intervention group=23.8%, sham TMS intervention group=5.2%, odds ratio= 8.09, 95% CI= 4.71-13.90, P < 0.001) at the stimulation site, but these non-serious events were mostly mild and transient after TMS treatment. Conclusions: These findings provide evidence for the safety and patients' tolerance of transcranial magnetic stimulation technique as an alternative monotherapy or as an add-on treatment for major depressive disorder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据