4.6 Article

Numerical Modeling of Welding Porosity Formation and Dendrite Growth of 6xxx Aluminum Alloys

期刊

JOM
卷 74, 期 6, 页码 2428-2436

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11837-022-05213-3

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51901148, 51975286]
  2. State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing in NPU [SKLSP202006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a cellular automaton-finite difference-lattice Boltzmann (CA-FD-LB) model coupled with ternary alloy thermodynamics calculations was used to simulate the formation of welding porosity and dendritic solidification during welding of 6xxx aluminum alloys (Al-Mg-Si). It was found that the welding pores nucleate and grow in the interdendritic space and are squeezed into irregular shapes by the growing dendrites. The results also showed that the heat input affects the formation of welding pores and the growth of dendrites, with decreasing heat input leading to finer dendrite arms, decreased porosity percentage, and increased gas pore numbers.
A cellular automaton-finite difference-lattice Boltzmann (CA-FD-LB) model, coupled with the calculation of ternary alloy thermodynamics, has been applied for the simulations of welding porosity formation and dendritic solidification during welding of 6xxx aluminum alloys (Al-Mg-Si). It is revealed that the nucleation and growth of the welding pores occur in the interdendritic space, and that the pores are squeezed into irregular shapes by the growing dendrites. During the solidification of the weld pool, the porosity percentage and welding pore number continuously increase. The effects of the heat input on the welding pore formation and dendrite growth have been investigated. The results indicate that, with the heat input decreasing, the dendrite arms become finer, while the percentage of porosity decreases and the gas pore numbers increase. This work not only reproduces the welding porosity formation of 6xxx aluminum alloys but also guides the prediction of the microstructure of the welded joints.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据