4.3 Article

Dark-field ultrasonic imaging method using mode-converted longitudinal evanescent field

期刊

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
卷 61, 期 SG, 页码 -

出版社

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.35848/1347-4065/ac4add

关键词

mode-converted longitudinal evanescent field; laser scanning; nondestructive evaluation; dark field imaging; super resolution

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19K21910, 21H04592]
  2. JST FOREST program [JPMJFR2023]
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21H04592, 19K21910] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We propose a dark-field evanescent imaging method that can visualize surface/subsurface micro defects with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This method utilizes the mode-converted longitudinal evanescent field (MCLEF) generated at defects by the incidence of a shear (S) wave. The proposed method has been proven in experiments and finite element (FE) simulations to have super-resolution imaging capability for holes of different sizes and higher SNR than conventional methods for various defect geometries.
We propose a dark-field evanescent imaging method to visualize surface/subsurface micro defects with a high signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). This method utilizes the mode-converted longitudinal evanescent field (MCLEF) generated at defects by the incidence of a shear (S) wave. When an incident S wave only has the in-plane displacement on the top surface of a specimen, the 2D scan of a laser Doppler vibrometer, that can only measure out-of-plane displacements, can selectively probe the MCLEF with out-of-plane displacements. Note that the MCLEF can be generated even at a defect that is much smaller than the diffraction limit. In this paper, after describing the principle of the proposed method, we prove the concept in a specimen with a hole by finite element (FE) simulation and experiments. Further FE simulations demonstrate its super-resolution imaging capability for holes of different sizes and higher SNR than a conventional method for various defect geometries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据