4.8 Article

Protozoal food vacuoles enhance transformation in Vibrio cholerae through SOS-regulated DNA integration

期刊

ISME JOURNAL
卷 16, 期 8, 页码 1993-2001

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41396-022-01249-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. CAUL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Protozoal predation enhances lateral gene transfer (LGT) in Vibrio cholerae, resulting in genetic variants with increased capacity to survive grazing. The food vacuole may serve as a hot spot for LGT, driving genetic diversification and evolution.
Vibrio cholerae, the bacterial pathogen responsible for the diarrheal disease cholera, resides in the aquatic environment between outbreaks. For bacteria, genetic variation by lateral gene transfer (LGT) is important for survival and adaptation. In the aquatic environment, V. cholerae is predominantly found in biofilms associated with chitinous organisms or with chitin rain. Chitin induces competency in V. cholerae, which can lead to LGT. In the environment, V. cholerae is also subjected to predation pressure by protist. Here we investigated whether protozoal predation affected LGT using the integron as a model. Integrons facilitate the integration of mobile DNA (gene cassettes) into the bacterial chromosome. We report that protozoal predation enhances transformation of a gene cassette by as much as 405-fold. We show that oxidative radicals produced in the protozoal phagosome induces the universal SOS response, which in turn upregulates the integron-integrase, the recombinase that facilitates cassette integration. Additionally, we show that during predation, V. cholerae requires the type VI secretion system to acquire the gene cassette from Escherichia coli. These results show that protozoal predation enhances LGT thus producing genetic variants that may have increased capacity to survive grazing. Additionally, the conditions in the food vacuole may make it a hot spot for LGT by accumulating diverse bacteria and inducing the SOS response helping drive genetic diversification and evolution.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据