4.5 Article

Design of MoS2/NC/MnO2 hollow microsphere electrode for high performance supercapacitors

期刊

IONICS
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 2403-2411

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-022-04460-3

关键词

Flowerlike molybdenum disulfide; Manganese dioxide; N-doped carbon; Supercapacitors; Electrochemical performance

资金

  1. NSFC [52102235]
  2. Youth Foundation of Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province [C2020202009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The composite hybrid with hollow microspheres structure composed of molybdenum disulfide/N-doped carbon/Manganese dioxide (MoS2/NC/MnO2) has excellent electrochemical performances for supercapacitors applications, including high specific capacitance and better cycle stability compared to MnO2 composite. It has the potential to be a strong competitor in high performance supercapacitor electrode materials.
The composite hybrid with hollow microspheres structure composed of molybdenum disulfide/N-doped carbon/Manganese dioxide (MoS2/NC/MnO2) was synthesized via a facile template-assisted method, which shown excellent electrochemical performances for supercapacitors applications. The hollow MoS2 microspheres are assembled by layered MoS2 nanosheets, which provide substantial ion channels and large surface area for electrolyte ion transport. Polyaniline as the precursor of carbon materials is grown on the surface of the hollow MoS2 microspheres by oxidative polymerization. After carbonization, the composite material is obtained by hydrothermal method. The MoS2/NC/MnO2 hollow microspheres electrode possesses high specific capacitance of 882 F.g(-1) at a scan rate of 0.5 A.g(-1) and a capacitance retention rate of 85.4% at 1 A.g(-1) after 2500 cycles charge-discharge, which keeps better cycle stability compared to MnO2 composite. The as-prepared MoS2/NC/MnO2 microspheres material has the potential to be a strong competitor in high performance supercapacitor electrode materials and has significant potential for supercapacitor applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据