4.5 Article

Metal-organic framework-derived CuTe@porous carbon composites as novel cathodes for aluminum ion batteries

期刊

IONICS
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 2853-2863

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11581-022-04530-6

关键词

Aluminum ion battery; Cathode material; Metal organic framework; CuTe

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772025]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a metal organic framework (HKUST-1) with a specific morphology was successfully synthesized and CuTe@C composites were prepared. When CuTe@C is applied to the cathode material for AIBs, it shows excellent electrochemical performance.
Due to the advantages of aluminum's considerable theoretical capacity, stability in air, and cheapness, rechargeable aluminum ion batteries (AIBs) have become an attractive new secondary battery system. However, cathode materials remain the most fundamental need for the study of AIBs. In this paper, a metal organic framework (HKUST-1) with a specific morphology was successfully synthesized and CuTe@C composites were prepared by subsequent tellurization/carbonization. CuTe@C composites can largely maintain the pore structure and microscopic octahedral morphology of the precursors. The large specific surface area and porous structure are conducive to improved diffusion transport conditions and higher electrochemical activity of the electrode. Meanwhile, the carbon matrix generated by organic ligands through the heat treatment plays an encapsulation role. When CuTe@C is applied to the cathode material for AIBs, it provides a high first cycle discharge specific capacity of 556.3 mAh g(-1) at a current density of 200 mA g(-1), and the discharge voltage plateau (approximately at 1.3 V) is evident. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis and galvanostatic charge-discharge test indicate that the reaction mechanism is the intercalation/deintercalation of AlCl4-. In summary, this method of preparing shape-controlled composites provides a novel idea for the synthesis of AIBs electrode materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据