4.5 Article

A phase II study of tarloxotinib (a hypoxia activated prodrug of a pan-erb tyrosine kinase inhibitor) in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or skin

期刊

INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS
卷 40, 期 4, 页码 782-788

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-022-01230-w

关键词

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; EGFR; Hypoxia-activated prodrugs; Phase II

资金

  1. Threshold Pharmaceuticals

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the safety and activity of Tarloxotinib in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC or CSCC. The results showed that Tarloxotinib did not provide clinically meaningful benefits for these types of cancers.
Background Tarloxotinib, a hypoxia-activated prodrug of an irreversible pan-ErbB tyrosine kinase inhibitor, represents a novel therapeutic which exploits the tumor-specific hypoxic environment as a mechanism for tumor-specific targeting. This study evaluated the safety and activity of tarloxotinib in recurrent or metastatic (R/M) cutaneous (CSCC) or head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Methods This was a phase II two-stage multi-centre study for patients with R/M HNSCC or CSCC. All patients received tarloxotinib 150 mg/m2 on days 1,8,15 and 22 in a 28-day cycle. Stage 1 enrolled patients in three cohorts: p16-negative HNSCC, p16-positive oropharyngeal SCC, and CSCC. In order for a cohort to proceed to stage 2 a minimum response rate of 5% was required. Results 30 patients were enrolled: 23% were female with median age of 63.3 years. The median duration of follow-up was 20 weeks. The median progression-free survival was 2.0 months (95%CI 1.8-3.4) and median overall survival 5.7 months (95%CI 3.6-8.0). Treatment was well tolerated. The objective response rate was 3% with one patient with CSCC having a partial response. Conclusions Hypoxia-activated prodrugs represent a novel approach to cancer treatment, however, no clinically meaningful benefit for tarloxotinib in R/M HNSCC or CSCC was identified in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据