4.2 Article

Nonparametric Testing of the Dependence Structure Among Points-Marks-Covariates in Spatial Point Patterns

期刊

INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW
卷 90, 期 3, 页码 592-621

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/insr.12503

关键词

Covariate; hypothesis testing; independence; marked point process; nonparametric inference

资金

  1. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [19-04412S]
  2. Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion [MTM2016-78917-R]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana [AICO/2019/198]
  4. Universitat Jaume I [UJI-B2018-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We investigate a testing method for the hypothesis of independence between a covariate and the marks in a marked point process. We propose to study the complete dependence structure in the triangle points-marks-covariates together and use a new variance correction approach for the tests. Simulation studies and real applications are conducted to demonstrate the performance of the methods.
We investigate testing of the hypothesis of independence between a covariate and the marks in a marked point process. It would be rather straightforward if the (unmarked) point process were independent of the covariate and the marks. In practice, however, such an assumption is questionable and possible dependence between the point process and the covariate or the marks may lead to incorrect conclusions. Therefore, we propose to investigate the complete dependence structure in the triangle points-marks-covariates together. We take advantage of the recent development of the nonparametric random shift methods, namely, the new variance correction approach, and propose tests of the null hypothesis of independence between the marks and the covariate and between the points and the covariate. We present a detailed simulation study showing the performance of the methods and provide two theorems establishing the appropriate form of the correction factors for the variance correction. Finally, we illustrate the use of the proposed methods in two real applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据