Comparison of the outcome of different bone grafts combined with modified core decompression for the treatment of ARCO II stage femoral head necrosis

Purpose Treatment of ONFH at an early stage is a challenging issue. The modified minimally invasive core decompression combined with bone graft implantation remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the early-middle outcomes of four groups with different bone grafts. Methods A total of 182 patients (192 hips) with ONFH at the ARCO II stage were randomly divided into four groups. The free fibular graft group (FFG), free vascularized fibular graft group (FVFG), autologous iliac bone group (ABG), and beta-tricalcium bioceramics phosphate graft (beta-TCPG) group. Each group was treated with the modified minimally invasive core decompression and bone graft implantation. The operation time and blood loss were recorded by the same observer. The clinical outcome was evaluated by the Harris Hip Score and VAS score (before, 14 days after surgery, and at the last follow-up). The radiographic progression of ONFH was evaluated at least 36 months of follow-up. Results All cases were successful without any complications after the operation. The patients were followed up for 42 to 48 (44.62 +/- 1.81) months. There were statistically significant differences among the four groups in operation time (F value =1520.67; P < 0.01) and blood loss (F value = 5366.81; P < 0.01). The Harris Hip Score in each group was improved significantly from pre-operation to last follow-up (all P < 0.01). At the last follow-up, the difference in the Harris Hip Score in each group was not statistically significant (F value= 0.54; P = 0.984). The VAS scores in each group were decreased significantly from the pre-operation to 14 days after surgery (all P < 0.01). At 14 days after surgery, the difference in the VAS score in each group was not statistically significant (F value = 0.64; P = 0.59). At the last follow-up, three hips collapsed on the femoral head in the FFG group, two in the FVFG group, two in the ABG group, and three in the beta-TCPG group. Conclusion The four different bone graft implantation showed satisfactory early-middle outcomes. As compared to other bone grafts, the beta-TCP bioceramics graft has the advantages of shorter operation time and lesser blood loss. It may be a choice as a bone graft for the treatment of ONFH at an early stage.

Automated summary

This study compared the early-middle outcomes of four different bone grafts for the treatment of early stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). The beta-TCP bioceramics graft showed satisfactory results and had the advantages of shorter operation time and lesser blood loss compared to other bone grafts.