期刊
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEDIMENT RESEARCH
卷 37, 期 5, 页码 539-552出版社
IRTCES
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2022.01.004
关键词
PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0 concentrations; Field measurements; Horizontal flux; Vertical flux; PM balances
资金
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) of Germany
- DFG-GZ
- National Council for Research and Technology of Argentina (CONICET)
A detailed analysis of horizontal and vertical particulate matter fluxes during wind erosion was conducted. The study found that the three fractions of PM measurement were differently influenced by wind and shear velocities. Although general relationships between wind speed, PM concentration, and fluxes were identified, the contribution of the measuring field was low due to the variety of sources determining PM concentrations. Additionally, calibration of the measuring devices was necessary due to differences between them.
A detailed analysis of horizontal and vertical particulate matter (PM) fluxes during wind erosion has been done, based on measurements of PM smaller than 10, 2.5, and 1.0 mu mm, at windward and leeward positions on a measuring field. The three fractions of PM measurement are differently influenced by the increasing wind and shear velocities of the wind. The measured concentrations of the coarser fractions of the fine dust, PM10, and PM2.5, increase with wind and shear velocity, whereas the PM1.0 concentrations show no clear correlation to the shear velocity. The share of PM2.5 on PM10 depends on the measurement height and wind speed and varies between 4 and 12 m/s at the 1 m height ranging from 25% to 7% (average 10%), and at the 4 m height from 39% to 23% (average 30%). Although general relationships between wind speed, PM concentration, and horizontal and vertical fluxes could be found, the contribution of the measuring field was very low, as balances of incoming and outgoing fluxes show. Consequently, the measured PM concentrations are determined from a variety of sources, such as traffic on unpaved roads, cattle drives, tillage operations, and wind erosion, and thus, represent all components of land use and landscape structure in the near and far surroundings of the measuring field. The current results may reflect factors from the landscape scale rather than the influence of field-related variables. The measuring devices used to monitor PM concentrations showed differences of up to 20%, which led to considerable deviations when determining total balances. Differences up to 67% between the calculated fluxes prove the necessity of a previous calibration of the devices used. (c) 2022 International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation/the World Association for Sedimentation and Erosion Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据