4.7 Article

Predefined-time tracking control for high-order nonlinear systems with control saturation

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/rnc.6131

关键词

control saturation; high-order nonlinear system; Lyapunov function-like method; predefined-time stability; tracking control

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61903245, 61903032, 61973100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An innovative predefined-time tracking control algorithm is proposed for high-order nonlinear systems with control saturation and disturbance, which can directly calculate the upper bound of settling-time by user-defined parameters. The algorithm uses a predefined-time observer and an auxiliary dynamic system to handle disturbance and control saturation, designed using the backstepping method. The flexibility of the controller design is improved by allowing different parameters related to settling-time in each virtual controller.
In this paper, an innovative predefined-time tracking control algorithm is proposed for high-order nonlinear systems with control saturation and disturbance, which can directly calculate the upper bound of settling-time by user-defined parameters. First, a predefined-time observer based on tracking differentiator is applied to handle the disturbance. Next, a new predefined-time tracking control algorithm is designed using the backstepping method, and a novel auxiliary dynamic system is designed to deal with the control saturation. The stability of the closed-loop system is analyzed applying Lyapunov function-like method. The derivative of the virtual controller is obtained by the first-order filter to reduce the computation burden. It is worth mentioning that, different from the exiting results, all parameters related to settling-time in each virtual controller can be selected differently, and it can improve the flexibility of the controller design. Finally, the robustness and effectiveness of the investigated algorithm have been demonstrated by two typical numerical simulations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据