4.7 Article

Resistance to slurry erosion by WC-10Co-4Cr and Cr3C2-25(Ni20Cr) coatings deposited by HVOF stainless steel F6NM

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2022.105830

关键词

HVOF; Slurry erosion; Dul-Hasti; Tungsten; Sand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the slurry erosive wear of coatings sprayed on hydroelectric turbine machinery using the HVOF process. It was found that the WC-10Co-4Cr coating exhibited superior erosion resistance compared to the Cr3C2-25(Ni20Cr) coating. These coatings have the potential to significantly enhance the wear resistance of turbine materials, highlighting their importance in practical applications.
Hydroelectric turbine machinery experience extreme wear and tear due to slurry erosion and is one of the leading causes for the unplanned shutdown of hydro power plants. The coatings produced by High-velocity oxy-fuel (HVOF) thermal spray process on different hydro-turbine parts is known for improving wear resistance. In the present study, WC-10Co-4Cr and Cr3C2 - 25(Ni20Cr) coatings were sprayed by HVOF process on F6NM stainless steel of Dul-Hasti hydro-power plant turbine material. The slurry erosive wear studies of developed coatings was performed using high speed slurry erosive wear tester. Sediments collected from Dul-Hasti power plant dam site was taken as erodent material. The effect of four parameters specifically rotational speed (500-1250 rpm), slurry concentration (25-40 wt%), sand particle size (125-425 mu m), and test duration (450-900 min) on slurry erosion of coated materials was studied. It was observed that among all the developed three coatings, the WC-10Co-4Cr coated samples has shown superior erosion resistance compared to Cr3C2 - 25(Ni20Cr) coated samples due to its improved micro-hardness. Both the developed coatings were observed to be useful in enhancing the erosion resistance of F6NM steel significantly. Erosion mechanism were studied in detail using SEM. The properties such as hardness and porosity were also examined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据