4.7 Article

Near-infrared analysis of nanofibrillated cellulose aerogel manufacturing

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2022.121581

关键词

Freeze-drying; Near-infrared spectroscopy; Aerogel; Biomaterials; Nanofibrillated cellulose; Biophotonics

资金

  1. Emil Aaltonen Foundation [200141N, 210137N]
  2. UPM Business Finland (BF) [GD-96]
  3. NordForsk [85352]
  4. Academy of Finland GeneCellNano Flagship [337430]
  5. EVE projects [2581/31/2018, 1842/31/2019]
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [337430] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Near-infrared spectroscopy can be used to monitor the residual water content of freeze-dried products, and our predictive model accurately predicts the residual water content of different biomaterial aerogels. This is important for the freeze-drying of biomaterials and aerogel fabrication.
Biomaterial aerogel fabrication by freeze-drying must be further improved to reduce the costs of lengthy freeze-drying cycles and to avoid the formation of spongy cryogels and collapse of the aerogel structures. Residual water content is a critical quality attribute of the freeze-dried product, which can be monitored in-line with near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. Predictive models of NIR have not been previously applied for biomaterials and the models were mostly focused on the prediction of only one formulation at a time. We recorded NIR spectra of different nanofibrillated cellulose (NFC) hydrogel formulations during the secondary drying and set up a partial least square regression model to predict their residual water contents. The model can be generalized to measure residual water of formulations with different NFC concentrations and the excipients, and the NFC fiber concentrations and excipients can be separated with the principal component analysis. Our results provide valuable information about the freeze-drying of biomaterials and aerogel fabrication, and how NIR spectroscopy can be utilized in the optimization of residual water content.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据