4.7 Article

Fractal Dimension Feature as a Signature of Severity in Disorders of Consciousness: An EEG Study

期刊

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0129065722500319

关键词

Disorder of consciousness (DOC); vegetative state (VS); minimally conscious state (MCS); Higuchi's fractal dimension (HFD); entropy (E); electroencephalography (EEG); coma recovery scale-revised (CRS-R)

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of education (MIUR)
  2. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO) [1211820N]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate diagnosis of disorders of consciousness is crucial for tailored treatment programs. Using tools like EEG and a nonlinear method such as Higuchi's Fractal Dimension can improve diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing between MCS and VS groups. HFD has been found to be more sensitive than linear methods and shows promise in reducing misdiagnosis.
An accurate diagnosis of the disorder of consciousness (DOC) is essential for generating tailored treatment programs. Accurately diagnosing patients with a vegetative state (VS) and patients in a minimally conscious state (MCS), however, might be very complicated, reaching a misdiagnosis of approximately 40% if clinical scales are not carefully administered and continuously repeated. To improve diagnostic accuracy for those patients, tools such as electroencephalography (EEG) might be used in the clinical setting. Many linear indices have been developed to improve the diagnosis in DOC patients, such as spectral power in different EEG frequency bands, spectral power ratios between these bands, and the difference between eyes-closed and eyes-open conditions (i.e. alpha-blocking). On the other hand, much less has been explored using nonlinear approaches. Therefore, in this work, we aim to discriminate between MCS and VS groups using a nonlinear method called Higuchi's Fractal Dimension (HFD) and show that HFD is more sensitive than linear methods based on spectral power methods. For the sake of completeness, HFD has also been tested against another nonlinear approach widely used in EEG research, the Entropy (E). To our knowledge, this is the first time that HFD has been used in EEG data at rest to discriminate between MCS and VS patients. A comparison of Bayes factors found that differences between MCS and VS were 11 times more likely to be detected using HFD than the best performing linear method tested and almost 32 times with respect to the E. Machine learning has also been tested for HFD, reaching an accuracy of 88.6% in discriminating among VS, MCS and healthy controls. Furthermore, correlation analysis showed that HFD was more robust to outliers than spectral power methods, showing a clear positive correlation between the HFD and Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) values. In conclusion, our work suggests that HFD could be used as a sensitive marker to discriminate between MCS and VS patients and help decrease misdiagnosis in clinical practice when combined with commonly used clinical scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据