4.7 Article

Validation and Data-Integration of Yeast-Based Assays for Functional Classification of BRCA1 Missense Variants

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23074049

关键词

BRCA1; yeast-based functional assays; variant of uncertain significance; variant classification; homologous recombination; gene reversion; machine learning

资金

  1. Fondazione Pisa [127/16]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study developed a method called yBRCA1, which integrates data from homologous recombination, gene reversion, and small colony phenotype assays to accurately classify variants of the BRCA1 gene as benign or pathogenic, providing a new tool for assessing the risk of breast and ovarian cancer.
Germline mutations in the BRCA1 gene have been reported to increase the lifetime risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer (BOC). By new sequencing technologies, numerous variants of uncertain significance (VUS) are identified. It is mandatory to develop new tools to evaluate their functional impact and pathogenicity. As the expression of pathogenic BRCA1 variants in Saccharomyces cerevisiae increases the frequency of intra- and inter-chromosomal homologous recombination (HR), and gene reversion (GR), we validated the two HR and the GR assays by testing 23 benign and 23 pathogenic variants and compared the results with those that were obtained in the small colony phenotype (SCP) assay, an additional yeast-based assay, that was validated previously. We demonstrated that they scored high accuracy, sensitivity, and sensibility. By using a classifier that was based on majority of voting, we have integrated data from HR, GR, and SCP assays and developed a reliable method, named yBRCA1, with high sensitivity to obtain an accurate VUS functional classification (benign or pathogenic). The classification of BRCA1 variants, important for assessing the risk of developing BOC, is often difficult to establish with genetic methods because they occur rarely in the population. This study provides a new tool to get insights on the functional impact of the BRCA1 variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据