4.7 Article

Effects of Fe and Mn Deficiencies on the Root Protein Profiles of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Using Two-Dimensional Electrophoresis and Label-Free Shotgun Analyses

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073719

关键词

root; shotgun proteomics; Mn deficiency; Fe deficiency; tomato; 2-DE

资金

  1. Spanish Research Agency [PID2020-115856RB-100, MCIN/AEI/ 10.13039/501100011033]
  2. Aragon Government [A09-20R]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI Grant [24-7373, 22120003, 24370018]
  4. FPI-MINECO

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Iron and manganese are essential elements for plants, but they compete for the same uptake transporters and show conflicting interactions at the regulatory level. Proteomic techniques were used to study the proteome profiles of tomato roots grown under iron or manganese deficiency. The results showed that both deficiencies led to common cell wall remodelling, but differed greatly in terms of oxidative stress, coumarin production, protein, nitrogen, and energy metabolism.
Iron (Fe) and manganese (Mn) are two essential elements for plants that compete for the same uptake transporters and show conflicting interactions at the regulatory level. In order to understand the differential response to both metal deficiencies in plants, two proteomic techniques (two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and label-free shotgun) were used to study the proteome profiles of roots from tomato plants grown under Fe or Mn deficiency. A total of 119 proteins changing in relative abundance were confidently quantified and identified, including 35 and 91 in the cases of Fe deficiency and Mn deficiency, respectively, with 7 of them changing in both deficiencies. The identified proteins were categorized according to function, and GO-enrichment analysis was performed. Data showed that both deficiencies provoked a common and intense cell wall remodelling. However, the response observed for Fe and Mn deficiencies differed greatly in relation to oxidative stress, coumarin production, protein, nitrogen, and energy metabolism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据