4.7 Article

Bio-based Interpenetrating Network Polymer Composites from Locust Sawdust as Coating Material for Environmentally Friendly Controlled-Release Urea Fertilizers

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 64, 期 28, 页码 5692-5700

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01688

关键词

modified polymer-coated urea; bio-based coating; nitrogen release rate

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31572201]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2015CM035]
  3. Shandong agricultural innovation team [SDAIT-17-04]
  4. Shandong Province [[2014] 183]
  5. Great innovation projects in agriculture of Shandong Province [[2013] 136]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel polymer-coated nitrogen (N) fertilizer was developed using bio-based polyurethane (PU) derived from liquefied locust sawdust as the coating material. The bio-based PU was successfully coated on the surface of the urea fertilizer prills to form polymer-coated urea (PCU) fertilizer for controlled N release. Epoxy resin (EP) was also used to further modify the bio-based PU to synthesize the interpenetrating network (IPN), enhancing the slow-release properties of the PCU. The N release characteristics of the EP-modified PCU (EMPCU) in water were determine at 25 degrees C and compared to that of PCU and EP-coated urea (ECU). The results showed that the EP modification reduced the N release rate and increased the longevity of the fertilizer coated with bio-based PU. A corn growth study was conducted to further evaluate the filed application of the EMPCU. In comparison to commercial PCU and conventional urea fertilizer, EMPCU was more effective and increased the yield and total dry matter accumulation of the corn. Findings from this work indicated that bio-based PU derived from sawdust can be used as coating materials for PCU, particularly after EP modification. The resulting EMPCU was more environmentally friendly and cost-effective than conventional urea fertilizers coated by EP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据