4.7 Review

The Multiverse of Plant Small RNAs: How Can We Explore It?

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073979

关键词

plant small RNAs; siRNAs; microRNAs; vsiRNAs; phasiRNAs; natsiRNAs; tasiRNAs; bioinformatics tools; NGS; sRNA-seq; software; data analysis

资金

  1. European Union [739582, 664620]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews over 35 tools developed specifically for plant sRNAs in recent years and explores their algorithms and applications, aiming to assist biologists in choosing the appropriate tool for analyzing plant sRNA datasets.
Plant small RNAs (sRNAs) are a heterogeneous group of noncoding RNAs with a length of 20-24 nucleotides that are widely studied due to their importance as major regulators in various biological processes. sRNAs are divided into two main classes-microRNAs (miRNAs) and small interfering RNAs (siRNAs)-which differ in their biogenesis and functional pathways. Their identification and enrichment with new structural variants would not be possible without the use of various high-throughput sequencing (NGS) techniques, allowing for the detection of the total population of sRNAs in plants. Classifying sRNAs and predicting their functional role based on such high-performance datasets is a nontrivial bioinformatics task, as plants can generate millions of sRNAs from a variety of biosynthetic pathways. Over the years, many computing tools have been developed to meet this challenge. Here, we review more than 35 tools developed specifically for plant sRNAs over the past few years and explore some of their basic algorithms for performing tasks related to predicting, identifying, categorizing, and quantifying individual sRNAs in plant samples, as well as visualizing the results of these analyzes. We believe that this review will be practical for biologists who want to analyze their plant sRNA datasets but are overwhelmed by the number of tools available, thus answering the basic question of how to choose the right one for a particular study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据