4.7 Review

Are We Studying Non-Coding RNAs Correctly? Lessons from nc886

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23084251

关键词

non-coding RNA; nc886; overexpression; knockdown; assay

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korea government (Ministry of Science and ICT
  2. MSIT) [NRF-2019R1A2C2088108]
  3. National Cancer Center, Korea [NCC-2110191]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have revolutionized the understanding of gene expression regulation. However, there are still questions regarding the experimental design and accurate identification of ncRNAs. This review focuses on the example of nc886 to discuss the caution and guidelines when studying ncRNAs.
Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), such as microRNAs or long ncRNAs, have brought about a new paradigm in the regulation of gene expression. Sequencing technologies have detected transcripts with tremendous sensitivity and throughput and revealed that the majority of them lack protein-coding potential. Myriad articles have investigated numerous ncRNAs and many of them claim that ncRNAs play gene-regulatory roles. However, it is questionable whether all these articles draw conclusions through cautious gain- and loss-of function experiments whose design was reasonably based on an ncRNA's correct identity and features. In this review, these issues are discussed with a regulatory ncRNA, nc886, as an example case to represent cautions and guidelines when studying ncRNAs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据