4.7 Article

ClPIF3-ClHY5 Module Regulates ClPSY1 to Promote Watermelon Fruit Lycopene Accumulation Earlier under Supplementary Red Lighting

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23084145

关键词

Citrullus lanatus; red light; lycopene; ClPIF3; ClHY5

资金

  1. Agriculture Research System of China [CARS-25]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that supplementary red lighting in a greenhouse significantly increased the content of lycopene in watermelon flesh. The major gene responding to red light in lycopene synthesis pathway was identified as PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1 (ClPSY1). Additionally, two key transcription factors involved in light signal transduction, PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORS 3 (ClPIF3) and LONG HYPOCOTYL 5 (ClHY5), were identified in watermelon flesh. Furthermore, it was discovered that ClHY5 and ClPIF3 formed a transcriptional module that responded to red light and regulated watermelon lycopene accumulation.
Lycopene content is one of the important factors for determining watermelon fruit quality. In this study, a small-type watermelon was grown in a greenhouse with supplementary red lighting for 10 h per day. The results showed that the content of lycopene in the flesh was increased 6.3-fold after 25 days of supplementary red lighting. qRT-PCR analysis showed that PHYTOENE SYNTHASE 1(ClPSY1) is the major gene that responds to red light within the lycopene synthesis pathway. Moreover, we identified two key transcription factors that were involved in light signal transduction PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTORS 3 (ClPIF3) and LONG HYPOCOTYL 5 (ClHY5) in watermelon flesh. The interaction experiments showed that ClHY5, a potent ClPIF3 antagonist, regulated ClPSY1 expression by directly targeting a common promoter cis-element (G-box). Collectively, our findings identified that ClHY5 and ClPIF3 formed an activation-suppression transcriptional module that is responsive to red light and, through this model, regulated watermelon lycopene accumulation in greenhouse winter cultivation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据