4.7 Article

Identification of Novel GSK-3β Hits Using Competitive Biophysical Assays

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073856

关键词

FBDD; drug discovery; NMR; cancer; Alzheimer's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we identified promising GSK-3 beta inhibitors through 1D F-19 NMR fragment screening and biophysical assays. We also proposed an alternative screening workflow to overcome the limitations of common GSK-3 beta inhibitors and found selective inhibitors and/or inhibitors capable of modulating GSK-3 beta activity without complete inhibition.
Glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK-3 beta) is an evolutionarily conserved serine-threonine kinase dysregulated in numerous pathologies, such as Alzheimer's disease and cancer. Even though GSK-3 beta is a validated pharmacological target most of its inhibitors have two main limitations: the lack of selectivity due to the high homology that characterizes the ATP binding site of most kinases, and the toxicity that emerges from GSK-3 beta complete inhibition which translates into the impairment of the plethora of pathways GSK-3 beta is involved in. Starting from a 1D F-19 NMR fragment screening, we set up several biophysical assays for the identification of GSK-3 beta inhibitors capable of binding protein hotspots other than the ATP binding pocket or to the ATP binding pocket, but with an affinity able of competing with a reference binder. A phosphorylation activity assay on a panel of several kinases provided selectivity data that were further rationalized and corroborated by structural information on GSK-3 beta in complex with the hit compounds. In this study, we identified promising fragments, inhibitors of GSK-3 beta, while proposing an alternative screening workflow that allows facing the flaws that characterize the most common GSK-3 beta inhibitors through the identification of selective inhibitors and/or inhibitors able to modulate GSK-3 beta activity without leading to its complete inhibition.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据