4.7 Article

Repurposing Dipyridamole in Niemann Pick Type C Disease: A Proof of Concept Study

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23073456

关键词

Niemann Pick type C disease; adenosine; A(2A) receptor; dipyridamole

资金

  1. intramural funding Ricerca Corrente
  2. funding Ricerca Indipendente ISS 2020-2022 [ISS20-5cf22604a04d]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, it was found that increasing adenosine levels may represent a new therapeutic approach for NPC. Experimental evidence from animal models and patient cells indicates that increasing adenosine levels by inhibiting the equilibrative nucleoside transporter (ENT1) can reduce lipid accumulation and improve mitochondrial deficits in NPC.
Niemann Pick type C disease (NPC) is a rare disorder characterized by lysosomal lipid accumulation that damages peripheral organs and the central nervous system. Currently, only miglustat is authorized for NPC treatment in Europe, and thus the identification of new therapies is necessary. The hypothesis addressed in this study is that increasing adenosine levels may represent a new therapeutic approach for NPC. In fact, a reduced level of adenosine has been shown in the brain of animal models of NPC; moreover, the compound T1-11, which is able to weakly stimulate A(2A) receptor and to increase adenosine levels by blocking the equilibrative nucleoside transporter ENT1, significantly ameliorated the pathological phenotype and extended the survival in a mouse model of the disease. To test our hypothesis, fibroblasts from NPC1 patients were treated with dipyridamole, a clinically-approved drug with inhibitory activity towards ENT1. Dipyridamole significantly reduced cholesterol accumulation in fibroblasts and rescued mitochondrial deficits; the mechanism elicited by dipyridamole relies on activation of the adenosine A(2A)R subtype subsequent to the increased levels of extracellular adenosine due to the inhibition of ENT1. In conclusion, our results provide the proof of concept that targeting adenosine tone could be beneficial in NPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据