4.2 Article

Cosmic and growth matter analysis of deformed Horava-Lifshitz gravity

期刊

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0218271822500638

关键词

Cosmic implications; growth matter index analysis; deformed Horava-Lifshitz gravity

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP21K03547]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the consequences of using Tsallis dark energy with deformed Hotava-Lifshitz gravity framework in the flat FRW universe, finding that the fractional dark energy density approaches a specific value as redshift goes to zero, and the cosmic parameter exhibits phantom crossing behavior with deceleration supporting cosmic acceleration.
Horava-Lifshitz gravity is a very fascinating proposal of modified gravity for explaining the current acceleration and other cosmic issues. In continuation to this discussion, we explore the consequences of Tsallis dark energy with Hubble and particle horizons in the framework of deformed Hotava-Lifshitz gravity for flat FRW universe. The interaction between Tsallis holographic dark energy and dark matter is also taken into account to discuss the underlying scenario. It is found that fractional dark energy density (Omega(D)) approaches to 0.701(-0.03)(+0.03) as redshift goes to zero (present epoch) for both cases of horizons. The cosmic parameter (omega(D)) shows phantom crossing behavior in both models, i.e. it evolutes the universe from quintessence phase to phantom phase by crossing the vacuum horizon. In both cases of horizons, the deceleration supports the cosmic acceleration by exhibiting the negative values. The perturbation sound speed also favors the viability of our models through positive behavior. The coincidence parameter supports the exchange of dark matter to dark energy phenomenon through positivity. We also discuss the behavior of growth rate and growth index in the growth of matter density perturbations for both horizons. These parameters mimic the ACDM behavior of the universe.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据