4.2 Review

Hemoglobinopathies and preimplantation diagnostics

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijlh.13851

关键词

embryo biopsy; HBB; hemoglobinopathies; IVF; PGT-M

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hemoglobinopathies are common inherited disorders that are difficult to manage and treat. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) is a valuable reproductive option for couples carrying hemoglobinopathy genes. PGT-M has evolved over the years, allowing for the simultaneous diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies and screening for chromosomal abnormalities in embryos, with the aim of improving success rates and increasing the number of unaffected babies born.
Hemoglobinopathies constitute some of the most common inherited disorders worldwide. Manifestations are very severe, patient management is difficult and treatment is not easily accessible. Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) is a valuable reproductive option for hemoglobinopathy carrier-couples as it precludes the initiation of an affected pregnancy. PGT-M is performed on embryos generated by assisted reproductive technologies and only those found to be free of the monogenic disorder are transferred to the uterus. PGT-M has been applied for 30 years now and beta-thalassemia is one of the most common indications. PGT may also be applied for human leukocyte antigen typing to identify embryos that are unaffected and also compatible with an affected sibling in need of hemopoietic stem cell transplantation. PGT-M protocols have evolved from PCR amplification-based, where a small number of loci were analysed, to whole genome amplification-based, the latter increasing diagnostic accuracy, enabling the development of more generic strategies and facilitating multiple diagnoses in one embryo. Currently, numerous PGT-M cycles are performed for the simultaneous diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies and screening for chromosomal abnormalities in the embryo in an attempt to further improve success rates and increase deliveries of unaffected babies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据