4.7 Article

Low-velocity ice impact response and damage phenomena on steel and CFRP sandwich composite

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2021.104134

关键词

Low-velocity impact; Ice impactor; Sandwich composite; Ice fragmentation

资金

  1. United States Office of Naval Research [N00014-18-1-2546]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the low-velocity impact response of ice impactor on steel and carbon fiber reinforced polymer sandwich composite. The findings show that the shape, length, and impact velocity of the ice impactors have an effect on the type and severity of damage in the composite material.
This study investigates the low-velocity impact (LVI) response of ice impactor on steel and carbon fiber rein-forced polymer (CFRP) sandwich composite. This research explores the effect of impactor's shape and length at different impact velocity by preparing customized conical and cylindrical ice impactors. Ice impactors that are frozen at -12 degrees C for 48 h are found to have the highest occurrence of partial damage, while ice impactors conditioned at -22 degrees C for 72 h experienced full damage. Although higher peak force is observed during ice-steel interaction, greater displacement and absorbed energy are evident in ice-composite impact. Results also show that full damage of ice impactor is more prominent for sandwich composite specimens, while partial damage is commonly seen in steel specimens. This is attributed to multiple hits and higher ratio of collision velocity during impact on sandwich composite. Damage type occurrences also vary depending on shape, length, and impact velocity of the ice impactors. Presence of pre-existing cracks during freezing as well as variation in stress level at the impact region influence the strength of the ice impactors. Matrix crack and facesheet dent are observed as the dominant damage mechanism in composite using X-ray micro-computed tomography. Different ice fragmentation processes are also characterized in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据