4.7 Article

Transition metal carbides coupled with nitrogen-doped carbon as efficient and stable Bi-functional catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction and hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 27, 页码 13240-13250

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.02.082

关键词

Bi-functional catalysts; Transition metal carbides; Oxygen reduction reaction; Hydrogen evolution reaction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China, China [11805211]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2019A1515011006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a in-situ simple approach to synthesize ultra small sized transition metal carbides nanoparticles coupled with nitrogen-doped carbon hybrids as catalysts, which exhibit excellent performances in oxygen reduction reaction and hydrogen evolution reaction in acidic electrolyte.
Developing non-precious metal catalysts for oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is crucial for proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC), metal-air batteries and water splitting. Here, we report a in-situ simple approach to synthesize ultra small sized transition metal carbides (TMCs) nanoparticles coupled with nitrogen-doped carbon hybrids (TMCs/NC, including WC/NC, V8C7/NC and Mo2C/NC). The TMCs/NC exhibit excellent ORR and HER performances in acidic electrolyte as bi-functional catalysts. The potential of WC/NC at the current density of 3.0 mA cm(-2) for ORR is 0.814 V (vs. reversible hydrogen electrode (RHE)), which is very close to Pt/C (0.827 V), making it one of the best TMCs based ORR catalysts in acidic electrolyte. Besides, the TMCs/NC exhibit excellent performances toward HER, the Mo2C/NC only need an overpotential of 80 mV to drive the current density of 10 mA cm(-2), which is very close to Pt/C (37 mV), making it the competitive alternative candidate among the reported non-precious metal HER catalysts.(c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据