4.1 Article

Erythroblast predominance without CD41/cyCD41-positive blasts predicts favorable prognosis in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias treated with azacitidine

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEMATOLOGY
卷 115, 期 6, 页码 852-859

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s12185-022-03317-9

关键词

Myelodysplastic syndromes; Azacitidine; CD41; cyCD41; Erythroblast predominance; Prognostic analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the prognostic impact of erythroblast predominance (EP) in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with azacitidine. The study found that patients with EP and cyCD41+ blasts had shorter overall survival (OS), while patients with EP without cyCD41+ had better prognosis. By categorizing patients into different risk categories, the study found that risk category was associated with patients' survival.
This study examined the prognostic impact of erythroblast predominance (EP) in 61 patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) (n = 51) or acute myeloid leukemia (n = 10) treated with azacitidine. Median age was 78 years. EP, defined as > 40% erythroblasts and M/E < 1.0, was found in 21 patients, including 9 complex karyotypes (CK). In the 24 CK of the entire cohort, 5 were hyperdiploid and 15 were monosomal karyotype with -5/5q-, and 10 had immunophenotypically CD41/cyCD41 positive blasts (cyCD41+). The complete response (CR) rate was 32.8%. Median follow-up was 14 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 17 months. Although all patients with EP achieved high CR rates (61.9%) and extended OS (28 M, P = 0.056), patients with EP and cyCD41+ blasts had shorter OS (8 M, P = 0.002). EP (HR 0.39, P = 0.009) and cyCD41+ (HR 3.49, P = 0.018) were identified as prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. All patients with cyCD41+ had hyperdiploid or CK with -5/5q-. In conclusion, we divided patients into three risk categories: high (cyCD41+), low (EP without cyCD41+), and intermediate (non-CD41+ and non-EP), and median OS in these categories was 34, 17 and 8 months, respectively (P < 0.001).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据