4.5 Review

A review on thematic and chronological framework of impact assessment for green airports

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15435075.2022.2045298

关键词

Impact assessment; airport system; aircraft impact; energy consumption; air pollution; economic sustainability; noise

资金

  1. European Union [EFOP-3.6.1-16-2016-00003]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on analyzing the impact of airport operations and investments in a comprehensive manner, with a particular emphasis on the concept of green airports. The findings suggest that economic efficiency and design themes are of primary importance, followed by environmental concerns.
Environmental impact assessment comprises a set of analyses, and there are several subjects. However, the airport impact research subject has grown into a more integral and broader view. Green airports make this phenomenon more complex when analyzing different operational criteria. This study focused on easing the readers' understanding of the impact analysis phenomenon more comprehensively. Moreover, the motivation behind this paper is to express the roots of the research subject on the green airport concept. Three domains are defined to classify the impact analysis, affecting each other while focusing on operational or capital investments in the airports. Spending a budget or an organizational function might negatively affect carbon dioxide emissions or further toxic disseminating natural resources. This study has examined 93 published scientific papers to show the distribution of the classified subjects on the three domains as Energy, Natural resources, and economic sustainability. Despite the common superiority of environmental topics, it has been seen that economic efficiency and the importance of the design subjects are the main predecessors in this review. Subjects have diverted into the environmental issues in the later years. Also, popular keywords have been presented to the audience's attention, which counts the frequency in time.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据