4.5 Article

Effect of hydrophilic groups in lipids on the characteristics of starch-lipid complexes

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.15835

关键词

Chemical shift; hydrophilic groups; palmitate; rheological properties; starch-lipid complexes; XRD

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The complexation between starch and lipids is important for food quality, and the hydrophilic groups in lipids play a role in this interaction. This study investigated the complexation of palmitic acid and its esters with starch to understand the influence of the hydrophilicity of polar heads in lipids. The results showed that the hydrophilic groups affected the characteristics of starch-lipid complexes.
The complexation of starch and lipids has important implications for food quality, and the interaction is affected by hydrophilic groups in lipids. The complexation interaction of palmitic acid and its common esters with starch was investigated to clarify the influence of the hydrophilicity of polar heads in lipids. The results indicate that the difference in hydrophilic groups affected the characteristics of starch-lipid complexes. The difficulty level of complexation with starch was in the order of palmitic acid > glyceryl monopalmitate > L-ascorbyl palmitate, with the degree of double helix of the L-ascorbyl palmitate complex being the lowest. In contrast with palmitic acid, the viscoelasticity of complexes formed by glyceryl monopalmitate and L-ascorbyl palmitate with a higher number of hydroxyl groups was enhanced and exhibited obvious elastic characteristics. The more intensive complexation interaction caused the more evident changes of the C-13 NMR chemical shift attributed to starch. For the complexes of L-ascorbyl palmitate, glyceryl monopalmitate, and palmitic acid, chemical shift values of carbon at the methylene in glucose units shifted upfield by 0.34, 0.18, and 0.10 ppm, respectively. Hence, hydrophilic groups in lipids significantly affected the formation, structure, and physicochemical properties of starch-lipid complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据