4.7 Article

The film-forming Pichia spp. in a winemaker's toolbox: A simple isolation procedure and their performance in a mixed-culture fermentation of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Gewurztraminer must

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2022.109549

关键词

Aroma; Film formation; Gewurztraminer; Glycerol; Phenethyl acetate; Pichia kluyveri; Pichia kudriavzevii; Non; Saccharomyces yeasts; Wine fermentation

资金

  1. Hesse State Ministry of Higher Education, Research and the Arts
  2. Hesse initiative for scientific and economic excellence (LOEWE)
  3. Geisenheim University
  4. Macquarie University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an easy method for isolating Pichia species from grape must and investigates their co-fermentation effects with Saccharomyces cerevisiae on wine characteristics. The results show that co-inoculation with different Pichia species leads to changes in specific compound levels and increased glycerol content in the wine.
Certain yeast species belonging to the Pichia genus are known to form a distinctive film on grape must and wine. In a mixed-culture type fermentation, Pichia spp. (P. kluyveri in particular) are known to impart beneficial oenological attributes. In this study, we report on an easy isolation method of Pichia spp. from grape must by exploiting their film-forming capacity on media containing 10% ethanol. We isolated and identified two Pichia species, namely Pichia kudriavzevii and Pichia kluyveri, and subsequently co-inoculated them with Saccharomyces cerevisiae to ferment Gewurztraminer musts. Noteworthy differences included a significant increase in the 2-phe-nethyl acetate levels with the P. kluyveri co-fermentation and a general increase in ethyl esters with the P. kudriavzevii co-fermentation. Both Pichia co-inoculations yielded higher levels of glycerol in the final wines. Based on all the wine parameters we tested, the P. kluyveri strain that was isolated performed similarly to a commercial P. kluyveri strain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据