4.7 Article

Significant role of magnesium substitution in improved performance of layered O3-Na-Mn-Ni-Mg-O cathode material for developing sodium-ion batteries

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 8, 页码 10656-10667

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.7864

关键词

cathode material; mg-substitution; O3-type; sodium ion batteries; structural stability

资金

  1. Ministry of Human Resource Development [F24-5]
  2. Science and Engineering Research Board [EMR/2016/006302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The swap of inactive elements is an effective strategy for improving the electrochemical performance and structural durability of layer cathode materials in sodium ion batteries. In this study, cathode materials with Mg substitution were prepared via solid state reaction and demonstrated good electrochemical performance.
The swap of inactive elements is an auspicious strategy for enhancing electrochemical performance and structural durability of the layer cathode material in sodium ion batteries (SIBs). In this regard, the O3-type Na0.9Mn0.65Ni0.35O2 and inactive element Mg substituted Na0.9Mn0.55Ni0.35Mg0.1O2 and Na0.9Mn0.60Ni0.35Mg0.05O2 cathode materials were prepared using simple solid state reaction for SIBs. The Rietveld refinement confirms the cathode materials have rhombohedral structure and R-3m space group. O3-Na0.9Mn0.55Ni0.35Mg0.1O2, O3-Na0.9Mn0.60Ni0.35Mg0.05O2, and O3-Na0.9Mn0.65Ni0.35O2 deliver discharge capacity of 174, 179, and 202 mAh g(-1) in the voltage range from 2 to 4 V at current density of 0.1C. Moreover, partial quantity of magnesium (Mg) substitution enhances the structural stability by increasing sodium-oxide (NaO2) diffusion layer and reducing the transition metal oxide (TMO2) layers during cycling process in cathode materials for SIBs. HIGHLIGHTS O3-Na0.9Mn0.60Ni0.35Mg0.05O2 cathode is prepared via solid state reaction. Mg substitution is enlarged Na-ion diffusion layer. The prepared cathode reveals discharge capacity of 179 mAh g(-1). The obtained cathode exhibits good cycle performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据