4.7 Article

Preparation and characterization of Sargassum pallidum polysaccharide nanoparticles with enhanced antioxidant activity and adsorption capacity

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.082

关键词

Sargassum pallidum; Polysaccharide; Nanoparticles; Antisolvent precipitation; Antioxidant activity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31801542]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2022A1515010448]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [202102020267]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [2020ZYGXZR021]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Sargassum pallidum polysaccharide nanoparticles were successfully prepared using antisolvent precipitation method with optimized conditions. Nanocrystallization did not alter the primary and crystal structures of the polysaccharide, but improved its properties, suggesting nSPP-30's potential as an antioxidant or nano-carrier.
Sargassum pallidum polysaccharide nanoparticle (nSPP-30) was prepared via antisolvent precipitation method and the preparation conditions were optimized. The effects of nanocrystallization on the structure and biological activities of S. pallidum polysaccharide were investigated. Under the optimal preparation condition, the average particle size, polydispersity index (PDI), and xi-potential of nSPP-30 were 229.63 nm, 0.407, and-28.43 mV, respectively. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses indicated that nanocrystallization did not change primary and crystal structures of S. pallidum polysaccharide. However, nanocrystallization could improve the swelling, thermodynamic, and antioxidant properties of S. pallidum polysaccharide. In addition, the thymol adsorption capacity of nSPP-30 was enhanced as compared to the cor-responding polysaccharide. These results suggest that nSPP-30 can be developed as a potential antioxidant or natural nano-carrier to encapsulate thymol for practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据