4.6 Article

Finite element modeling of melt pool dynamics in laser powder bed fusion of 316L stainless steel

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-09029-y

关键词

Additive manufacturing; Melt pool dynamics; Laser powder bed fusion; Finite element method

资金

  1. Institutional Fund for Regional Scientific, Technological and Innovation Development (FORDECyT) of the National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT) of Mexico, through the project Aeronautical Strengthening in Mexico's North East Region

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A numerical model of laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) was developed to study the behavior of melt pool dynamics. The results showed that melt pool dimensions follow a thermal pattern, and a new criterion was proposed to accurately predict the dimensions.
In laser powder bed fusion (LPBF), the stability of melt pool dynamics determines the overall quality of a manufactured component. In this work, a numerical model of the LPBF process was developed in order to study and fully understand the behavior of the melt pool dynamics. The numerical model takes into account most of the manufacturing parameters, thermophysical properties, an enhanced thermal conductivity approach, and a volumetric heat source in order to precisely simulate LPBF. This research assumes that the energy emitted by the laser interacts with the metal powder with an absorptivity gradient through the layer thickness in order to calculate the thermal history of the process and the evolution of the melt pool dimensions. The obtained results determined that melt pool dimensions follow a thermal pattern, which is caused by the laser scanning strategy of the LPBF process. A new effective width criterion was proposed in the present research in order to accurately relate both calculated and measured dimensions of the melt pool, reducing the relative error of the model and obtaining data scattering with a standard deviation of +/- 7.21 mu m and a relative error of 2.92%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据