4.6 Article

Advanced metal transfer additive manufacturing of high temperature turbine blades

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-09176-2

关键词

Metal transfer additive manufacturing; Inconel 625; Microstructures; Aerospace Additive manufacturing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method for additive manufacturing of metal parts, specifically Inconel 625 jet turbine blades, has been developed. This method involves the use of hybrid PETG and Inconel 625 powder to create the desired shape, followed by debinding and sintering processes to produce a solid Inconel 625 structure. The resulting structures exhibit good mechanical properties, with slight porosity up to a temperature of 600 degrees C. This innovative approach revolutionizes manufacturing capabilities through the use of 3D metal transfer printing technology.
During the pursuit of this research, a novel method for the additive manufacture of metal parts has been developed. To this end, a way to create the complex geometrical structure of Inconel 625 jet turbine blades has been engineered. This advanced hybrid PETG and 90% Inconel 625 powder has first been Additive Manufactured into the shape of a turbine blade. The resulting green part produced was initially debinded at a temperature of 350 degrees C followed by heating to a sintering temperature of 1350 degrees C. This resulted in the transformation of a part into a solid Inconel 625 structure, which was later tested to understand the microstructural and mechanical properties of the material. It was found that although there was a slight degree of porosity, the structures were still mechanically sound, up to a temperature of 600 degrees C. The turbine blades were later machined to high tolerance 0.2 mu m finish surface as is required for such components. This novel means for the fabrication of such complex and ultimately expensive to create structures allows a revolution in manufacture capabilities through the use of 3D Metal transfer printing technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据