4.6 Article

Multi-phase-field microporomechanics model for simulating ice-lens growth in frozen soil

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/nag.3408

关键词

frozen soil; ice lens; phase field; phase transition; thermo-hydro-mechanics

资金

  1. Army Research Office [W911NF-18-2-0306]
  2. Division of Civil, Mechanical and Manufacturing Innovation, National Science Foundation [1846875]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Civil, Mechanical, & Manufact Inn [1846875] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a multi-phase-field poromechanics model that can simulate the growth and thaw of ice lenses and the resultant frozen heave and thaw settlement in frozen soils. The model introduces an immersed approach to capture the freezing influence on shear strength more accurately.
This article presents a multi-phase-field poromechanics model that simulates the growth and thaw of ice lenses and the resultant frozen heave and thaw settlement in multi-constituent frozen soils. The growth of segregated ice inside the freezing-induced fracture is implicitly represented by the evolution of two-phase fields that indicate the locations of segregated ice and the damaged zone, respectively. The evolution of two-phase fields is induced by their own driving forces that capture the physical mechanisms of ice and crack growths, respectively, while the phase-field governing equations are coupled with the balance laws such that the coupling among heat transfer, solid deformation, fluid diffusion, crack growth, and phase transition can be replicated numerically. Unlike phenomenological approaches that indirectly capture the freezing influence on the shear strength, the multiphase-field model introduces an immersed approach where both the homogeneous freezing and the ice-lens growth are distinctively captured by the freezing characteristic function and the driving force accordingly. Verification and validation examples are provided to demonstrate the capacities of the proposed models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据