4.7 Article

M13 phage coated surface elicits an anti-inflammatory response in BALB/c and C57BL/6 peritoneal macrophages

期刊

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 107, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.108654

关键词

M13 phage; Macrophage; Immunomodulation; Anti-inflammatory

资金

  1. Tarbiat Modares University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that M13 phages can polarize macrophages towards the M2 phenotype by inducing anti-inflammatory cytokine production and reducing inflammatory cytokine levels. This suggests the potential of M13 phages in immunotherapy.
Bacteriophages are one of the viral components of the human microbiome. M13 phages have recently been considered for immunotherapy because they can be detected by immune cells and stimulated immune responses. Macrophages are essential innate immune cells that respond to stimuli and direct subsequent immune responses. Therefore, it is crucial to evaluate the immunomodulatory effect of phage on macrophage function. For this purpose, peritoneal macrophages from BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were cultured on the M13 phage, M13 phage-RGD, gelatin-coated, and un-coated wells. Then macrophages were examined for morphological characteristics, L. arginine metabolism, redox potential, inflammatory cytokine production, and phagocytic activity after two and seven days of culture. We observed that M13 phage-coated surfaces induced anti-inflammatory cytokines production and reduced inflammatory cytokines level of BALB/c and C57BL/6 macrophages at the steady-state and post LPS stimulation. In addition, L. arginine metabolism and phagocytic activity of macrophages were directed to the M2 phenotype by induction of arginase-1 and efferocytosis in the M13 phage-containing groups, respectively. The present study confirms the M13 phage's ability to polarize macrophages toward the M2 phenotype. However, using M13 phage in treating inflammatory diseases in animal models could determine their immunotherapy capacity in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据