4.3 Review

Trilogy of COVID-19: Infection, Vaccination, and Immunosuppression

期刊

出版社

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000524056

关键词

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis; Vaccine responses; Vaccine efficacy; Immunosuppression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides an overview of vaccine efficacy studies, focusing on the well-characterized responses in healthy individuals and the limited evidence available for immunosuppressed populations. The challenges ahead include understanding vaccine responses in different populations and ensuring global vaccine equity.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the causative respiratory pathogen responsible for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In 2020, the power of open science was visible to all, as novel vaccinology led to rapid establishment of vaccine clinical trials, and subsequent authorization of SARS-CoV-2 at an unprecedented pace. This evoked rapid deployment of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and booster doses to keep with the ever-changing landscape of SARS-CoV-2. In this review, we provide an overview of vaccine efficacy studies, which have been well characterized in healthy individuals. Nevertheless, vaccine efficacy within the immunosuppressed is less well characterized, as these individuals were omitted from initial efficacy studies. Consequently, vaccine-induced responses in this group are relatively unknown. Currently, limited evidence investigating vaccine efficacy within the immunosuppressed is available. Here, we provide an overview of SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated pathogenesis. Furthermore, we undertake a critical analysis of observed vaccine responses from clinical studies, conducted in healthy and immunosuppressed populations. Whilst vaccine deployment has curbed mortality, there are significant challenges that lie ahead. This includes correlating vaccine responses with protective immunity and ensuring that global vaccine equity is met.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据