4.6 Article

MicroRNA let-7-5p targets the juvenile hormone primary response gene Kruppel homolog 1 and regulates reproductive diapause in Galeruca daurica

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2022.103727

关键词

microRNA; Kr-h1; Diapause; Juvenile hormone; Galeruca daurica

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [31760517]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia [2020MS503090]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study finds that let-7-5p plays an important role in the regulation of reproductive diapause and development in adult Galeruca daurica. By modulating the expression of Kruppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1), let-7-5p affects ovarian development, lipid accumulation, and fat body expansion.
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) regulate various biological processes in insects. However, their roles in the regulation of insect diapause remain unknown. In this study, we address the biological function of a conserved miRNA, let-7-5p in the regulation of a juvenile hormone primary response gene, Kruppel homolog 1 (Kr-h1), which modulates reproductive diapause in Galeruca daurica. The dual luciferase reporter assay showed that let-7-5p depressed the expression of Kr-h1. The expression profiles of let-7-5p and Kr-h1 displayed opposite patterns in the adult developmental stage. Injection of let-7-5p agomir in pre-diapause adult females inhibited the expression of Kr-h1, which consequently led to delay ovarian development, increase lipid accumulation, expand fat body, and induce reproductive diapause just as depleting Kr-h1 did. Conversely, injection of let-7-5p antagomir resulted in opposite effects by reducing fat storage and stimulating reproduction. Moreover, JH receptor agonist methoprene reduced the expression of let-7-5p, and rescued the ovarian development defects associated with let-7-5p overexpression. These results indicate that let-7-5p plays an important role in the regulation of reproductive diapause and development of G. daurica adults through its target gene Kr-h1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据