4.7 Article

Synthesis and electrochemical investigation of Z-type barium hexaferrite nanoplatelets

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 139, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109412

关键词

Ba3Co2Fe24O41; Magnetic studies; XPS studies; Supercapacitor; Pseudocapacitor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This work presents the supercapacitor performance of Z-type barium hexaferrite nanoplatelets prepared by citrate-nitrate auto combustion method. The study confirms the excellent magnetic and electrochemical properties of these nanoplatelets, suggesting their potential use in energy storage devices.
This work reports the supercapacitor performance of Z-type barium hexaferrite (Ba3Co2Fe24O41) nanoplatelets prepared by citrate-nitrate auto combustion approach. The single-phase Z-Type hexagonal structure was confirmed through structural investigation using XRD results. Metal oxygen stretching bands in various environments such as tetragonal and octahedral coordinates has been confirmed using FTIR spectra. Hexagonal platelike shaped grains were clearly seen from the morphological studies. The magnetic characteristics of Ba3Co2Fe24O41 sample were calibrated with VSM instrument at room temperature. The maximum saturation magnetization of 52.72 emu/g, retentivity of 29.88 emu/g and a coercivity of 124.97 Oe were obtained for Ba3Co2Fe24O41 nanoplatelets. The electrochemical (EC) performance of the Ba3Co2Fe24O41 nanoplatelets was studied for the first time with CV, GCD and EIS analysis. There is no report in the literature on studying the electrochemical performance of such important Ba3Co2Fe24O41 hexaferrites. The electrochemical GCD studies exhibited non-symmetrical discharge curves and a significant specific capacitance of 126 F g(-1) was attained at constant discharge current density (0.5 A g(-1)). The cyclic stability observation exposed 93% of capacitance retention after 1000 cycles, recommending the potential utilization of Ba3Co2Fe24O41 hexaferrites in energy storable devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据